Picture posting is enabled for all :)
Well if you saw the post that was deleted you may change your opinion.....just a thought.
Now just to get this straight, because I had the audacity to suggest that some of the peaceful demonstrators could be on Jobseekers allowances and as such should really be job seeking instead of protesting. I am deemed gullible enough to believe all that is printed in some of our more dubious newspapers, I am accused of calling every benefit claimant a criminal,I am also accused of being against people having the right to holding a peaceful protest. There is also a good chance I could be a NIMBYJust to put the record straight, I have no problem with job seekers signing off for the day and supporting worthy causes, but I resent the public purse being spent on job seekers who are not actively job seeking. I expect a lot of these protesters believe in what they are doing. I would say they have been mislead themselves, but if that is what they want to do good luck to them. Just sign off for the day is all I ask.Just as every person guilty or not, are subject to on the spot searches for drink driving, terrorism, drugs, guns etc. I see no problem asking if they are on job seekers benefits and have they signed off for the day.This whole situation has been badly handled from the start and the local council should have put their foot down to start with, not leave it for 10 years. But I suspect they listened to the bleeding hearts and also had their hands tied by the convoluted planning regulations. A lesson should be learned here and other councils should be taking note not to let it happen to them.
I reject the word 'racism' and i reject the use of it to stop the people discussing and debating foriegners and there abhorrent practices and behaviours.
there you go!QuoteI reject the word 'racism' and i reject the use of it to stop the people discussing and debating foriegners and there abhorrent practices and behaviours.my underlining, btw.which practices are abhorrent to you?