News:

Picture posting is enabled for all :)

Main Menu

Evaporation Rate

Started by Svengali, June 14, 2006, 11:22:44

Previous topic - Next topic

Svengali

Does anyone know the rate at which a pond - still new, and with not much surface cover - will lose water due to evaporation?
My pond measures approx 25' x 35' with a water tumble about 3' wide x 6' long, with a fall of abou 2' (around 2" deep)
My water loss is beginning to concern me - I have lost about 6" in a week! I know that it's been flipping hot, but is such a loss to be expected, or must I start looking for other causes?

JeremyB

Svengali


djbrenton

Even with plant cover I lost about 4 inches last week.

Gadfium

All number of variables conspire to vary the rate of evaporation e.g. temperature, humidity, wind speed (windy= more evaporation), surface area, atmospheric pressure, amount of shade/in pond shade plants, and water agitation. The waterfall will greatly contribute to evaporation loss... it increases the exposed surface area of the water (plus misting/aerosol drops being blown off course) and allows greater evaporation.

Don't have a formula for calculating the loss rate. Anyone?

There is also the possibility of a leak... this'd be expected to produce a steady decline in level. If cutting the flow rate of the waterfall slows water losses, then that would point towards evaporation as the major culprit, rather than a leak.

Once plants get established, then they'll cut evaporation losses. Even a few aquatic plants should cut the rate by about 10%, but I do think this figure is linked to ponds without waterfalls (lower surface area).

If you have a drainpipe nearby, then a diverter and a hose would be one way to refill the pond (once it rains), avoiding tap water and the likelihood of an algal bloom.

Garden Manager

My pond is quite small (about 3' x 4'), with a very shallow area at one end. I too have ben noticing some water loss during the hot weather, when the shallows loose water and the 'tide' goes out!. I have been geting a bit worried about it but now I hear of people with worse evaporation from larger ponds I am encouraged. I should add it is a new pond with little surface cover as yet.

I am led to beleive that small ponds loose water quicker because the water heats up more than a larger pond, but maybe you could also argue that the larger the surface area the more evaporation takes place.


Fortunatley I am not in a hosepipe ban area so can easily top up the pond when required.

PS - Those pond owners loosing alot of water - Are you sure you havent got a leak somewhere?

libby

Gadfium
you are full of knowledge,a very good answer :)

theothermarg

am I glad I read this , I've a small pond which seems to lose water I don;t think it's leaking but it needs topping up rather a lot my DH says I've too much weed in there and it's drinking it all!! now thats a different explanation isn't
;D ;D ;D ;D
Tell me and I,ll forget
Show me and I might remember
Involve me and I,ll understand

Svengali

Leak Identified!
What pointed me in the right direction was that although I lost a lot of water, very quickly, when the pond was full, when I was about 4" down, the water loss slowed.
When I first built the pond, I had a similar problem. I have a waterfall that drops down into the pond proper, with the liner going up a few inches under the waterfall liner and concrete. To give wildlife a "beach", the first couple of feet from the waterfall to the pond goes from 2" to 4" deep, before droping down.. To hide the liner, I put a covering of 4-6" pebbles over this liner, so that the water ripples through the stones.
I discovered last time that these stones caused the water to back up, under the waterfall, and leak away. I sealed the joint with a supposedly underwater mastic, but when I checked the same area today, I found that the mastic had lost all adhesion, & could be pulled straight off!
At least I know where the problem lies, and have ordered a VERY expensive mastic/sealer. I am also going to replace the stones with a piece of the pebble-faced liner that Margaret mentioned, in order to get the water down into the pond more quickly.
Hopefully, it is a case of Problem Solved!

JeremyB

Powered by EzPortal