Picture posting is enabled for all :)
I firmly believe no-one should ever trust any dog 100%.Not fair to the dog. You can't read it's mind and you can never assume it likes everything we do or say. We've always had dogs, sometimes two together.We've been very lucky to have dogs with non aggresive natures. All have been rescue dogs and all different breeds. The children were never left unsupervised with them, and if we weren't happy the dog was taken out of the equation. It's vital to teach youngsters to respect animals. When I was small I was bitten by our Retriever. I got a telling off as I had teased her with a biscuit.She got a wallop. Lesson learned by me.I cried because I was responsible for her getting a whack.I feel so very sad for the family, but I can't help thinking about the Grandmother, she must feel about as bad as you possibly can.
I have a rough coated JR and although I love her to bits - I would not leave her alone with young children. I believe you have to think along the lines a pack of dogs might think. Dogs are essentially pack animals and live in a system of hierarchy where the strongest dog is "top dog" and the rest work things out so they all know where they stand in the pecking order. So perhaps as far as my dog is concerned, she is third in line in our pack. Therefore if we were to introduce another "member" into our "pack" she would naturally trying to make sure she stayed 3rd in line and the new member knew its place - which as far as she would be concerned would be behind her. This would be achieved by the 3rd member of the pack challenging the introduced member to decide their standing within the pack. So, my theory is if you leave a dog with a new member of the family (ie. new baby) then the dog might attack the baby to maintain its position in the "pack". Does any of this make sense? Twinkletoes