News:

Picture posting is enabled for all :)

Main Menu

Duo fruit trees

Started by fitzsie, March 14, 2014, 18:02:33

Previous topic - Next topic

fitzsie

Has anybody grown the duo fruit trees ie two types of apples such as Bramley and Braeburn grafted onto one tree.

Found them on the internet and don't know whether to give them a try or would I be wasting my money?
Bring back Spotty Dog........

fitzsie

Bring back Spotty Dog........

galina

Quote from: fitzsie on March 14, 2014, 18:02:33
Has anybody grown the duo fruit trees ie two types of apples such as Bramley and Braeburn grafted onto one tree.

Found them on the internet and don't know whether to give them a try or would I be wasting my money?

They are quite common, some with 3, 4, 5 and even more varieties on one tree.  These are called family trees.  I have 2 pear trees with 3 varieties on each one and they have been fine and it is a nice way of getting more varieties without needing the space for many trees.

The only thing to look out for is whether one variety starts to dominate over the other/s.  It is a good idea to remember where the grafts are (they should be marked when you buy the tree) and if one dominates you have to prune to correct that.


tricia

A Bramley would need two compatible varieties as it's a triploid,  it needs two pollinators. I have a twelve year old family pear tree which fruits well most years. It's on a small rooting stock, which is important in my small garden.

Tricia

budgiebreeder

Yes i have  had this type of Apple Tree for a number of years now and they usually do quite well.
Earth fills her lap with treasures of her own.

Russell

I had a family tree quite a few years ago, it did well for me but not everything that happened was quite what was intended and I learned a thing or two.
It was a three-variety tree, shaped like a half-standard (chest height stem with three shoots coming out all equal size and labelled correctly). The varieties were George Cave (very early) Scarlet Pimpernel (even earlier) and Queen Cox (late).
It started fruiting at three years old, and already it was obvious that one of the stems, the Queen Cox was less vigorous that the two others. The rest of the tree carried on producing well, but the Queen Cox got more and more shaded out by the other two varieties. I tried to slow the others down by partly removing a strip of bark and cambium layer just below each of their shoots but they did not slow down. Instead a new shoot came out of the main stem nearby.
I let this new shoot grow, it was quite vigorous and it did not really look like a rootstock sucker. In three years the new shoot fruited and I identified it as a Tydeman's Early Worcester, which was a very good looking apple, second early, with an excellent flavour.
However the tree eventually became too large for the space it was planted into and I found that the Early Worcester does not take kindly to pruning, so after replacing the varieties that I liked (George Cave and Early Worcester) I regretfully took down the family tree.
I did not like the flavour of Scarlet Pimpernel.

Powered by EzPortal