One more to go....

[tricia]

u=534 ?? I'm sure that can't be right - or can it?

Tricia

[tricia]

[Flighty]

Tricia 534 sounds okay to me, after all you are a longtime member!  :)

[betula]

Cant see mine...... :(

[Trevor_D]

Sorry I started this now, 'cos me 'eads 'urting from the 'rithmetic....

I seem to be 5360. (But some days I feel a bit older than that.)

(But I thought I might attract a few lurkers out of the woodwork.)

[Ninnyscrops.]

6829 Den  ;)

Ninny

[cambourne7]

HEHE i am 55992  8)

[Flighty]

Cambourne7 that's a post number, yours is 4551!  :)

[elvis2003]

cant see mine either  ???

[Flighty]

Elvis it's 6195!  :)

The lowest number I've seen so far is for Palustris 145!

No make that Doris_Pinks 64!

[betula]

Thank you Miss Ninny     ;D

[elvis2003]

thanks flighty
x

[Baccy Man]

The user id's cant be entirely accurate as Dan's user id is 221, user #1 didn't register until about 2 months after Dan created the site. I suspect the memberlist has either been pruned or corrupted at some point.

[tricia]

Thanks Flighty - I must try to up my postings. As a long-time member I should have reached 1000 by now - but I haven't!

Tricia

[plainleaf2]

the answer is very simple. but I think you all will figure it out for yourself in while.
lqsym

[Flighty]

Tricia it's the quality that counts not the quantity! :)

[Chrispy]

There are a few inconsistencies in the memberlist though, it seems 9 people joined on the 1st January 1970 despite the fact the site didn't exist until 2003.

And I'm 10100 of 9000 ???

[plainleaf2]

the numbers have nothing to do with people or posts.
the the numbers are database object id numbers.

[Chrispy]

the numbers have nothing to do with people or posts.
the the numbers are database object id numbers.

If you want to get all serious about it, the user table will have an index that starts at 1 for the first user ect ect so they will relate to when you registered.
The inconsistancy will be from either users getting deleted or not completing their registration or some other such reason.
The date 1st January 1970 is the start of time as far as unix is concerned, if a user does not have a valid registration date, then the date is probably set to `0` which comes out at 1/1/1970

Well that was a load of boaring waffle, must have been raining all day.

[Froglegs]

1219  :o I should get out more ;D

If ya believe the rumors your 1 Ace   :-*   ;)  ;D

[ACE]

1219  :o I should get out more ;D

If ya believe the rumors your 1 Ace   :-*   ;)  ;D

Only number one with the ladies, Grenoille