Red Arrows banned from 2012 Olympics for being too British

Started by kt., April 03, 2008, 22:11:58

Previous topic - Next topic

kt.

I got this email today:

The world-famous Red Arrows have been banned from appearing at the
2012 London Olympics because they are deemed 'too British'.

Organisers of the event say that the Arrows military background
might be 'offensive' to other countries taking part in the Games.

The display team have performed at more than 4000 events worldwide,
but the Department of Culture, Media and Sport have deemed the
display team 'too militaristically British'.

Red Arrows pilots were said to be 'outraged', as they had hoped to
put on a truly world class display for the Games, something which
had never been seen before.

Being axed from a British-based event for being 'too British' is an
insult - the Arrows are a symbol of Britain .

The Red Arrows have been excellent ambassadors for British overseas
trade, as they display their British-built Hawk aircraft all over
the world.

The Arrows performed a short flypast in 2005 when the winning bid
was announced, but their flypast at the Games was to have been truly
spectacular.

It is to be hoped that common sense prevails, so if you disagree
with this decision, please sign the petition on the link.

<http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/RedArrows2012/?ref=redArrows2012>
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/RedArrows2012/?ref=redArrows2012

Please forward this on to everyone you can.




How pathetic can some politicians and do-gooders get. If people do not want British tradition and British ways in England then they need to decide if they are living in the right country for them.
All you do and all you see is all your life will ever be

kt.

All you do and all you see is all your life will ever be

Suzanne

I read this and thought it was a late April Fools joke........but then thought again and knowing how many ludicrous decisions are made in order not to offend anyone other than british citizens - perhaps not.

Jeannine

This is just plain daft, if they can't be used for the reasons stated, what does that do to the places were thay are used. I wonder if those places  feel  less important or they feel it doesn't matter if they feel offended.


This is double standards at it's best.

Use them for goodness sake.

If the powers that be are that worried then why keep them at all ??

Like I said it is just plain daft.

Aaaaaaaaaaaarg

XXJeannine
When God blesses you with a multitude of seeds double  the blessing by sharing your  seeds with other folks.

Hyacinth


DenBee

It's all down to the good ol' Sun noospaper, apparently.  And untrue (as you'd expect from the Sun  ;) ).

I must admit, like Alishka, that when I see anything that requests me to forward to everyone I know, I reach for Snopes.  ;D

There's a response from the Red Arrows here.  [http://www.raf.mod.uk/reds/teamnews/index.cfm?storyid=66845B01-1143-EC82-2E376B2F89D95041
Tread softly, for you tread on my greens.

redimp

This is very old, has been doing the rounds for ages, is a trumped up load of right wing crap and has been repeatedly shown to be so.   ::)
Lotty @ Lincoln (Lat:53.24, Long:-0.52, HASL:30m)

http://www.abicabeauty

kt.

All you do and all you see is all your life will ever be

Powered by EzPortal