Author Topic: BOTANICAL LATIN?  (Read 1855 times)

betula

  • Hectare
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,839
BOTANICAL LATIN?
« on: March 30, 2008, 09:41:20 »
I am studying botanical Latin at college at the moment.Thought a thread may help me to remember.

I am not going to ask you the Latin name I am asking you what the word is describing.These words are describing leaf characteristics.No googling ;D ;D

acutifolius

adenophyllus

alternifolius........................First one to answer is a genius ;D

Baccy Man

  • Hectare
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,893
  • Powys, Wales
Re: BOTANICAL LATIN?
« Reply #1 on: March 30, 2008, 09:58:50 »
acutifolius = pointy leaves
adenophyllus = sticky leaves
alternifolius = alternating leaves

betula

  • Hectare
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,839
Re: BOTANICAL LATIN?
« Reply #2 on: March 30, 2008, 10:48:40 »
Yes ,all correct.acutifolius is with sharply pointed leaves.

How about
tenuifolius

stenophyllus

sessilifolius

Baccy Man

  • Hectare
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,893
  • Powys, Wales
Re: BOTANICAL LATIN?
« Reply #3 on: March 30, 2008, 11:09:22 »
tenuifolius = fine/slender leaves
stenophyllus = narrow leaves
sessilifolius = stalkless leaves

Here are a few for you:

cuneifolius
remotifolius
villifolius

saddad

  • Hectare
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,895
  • Derby, Derbyshire (Strange, but true!)
Re: BOTANICAL LATIN?
« Reply #4 on: March 30, 2008, 11:12:37 »
well the first one has to be wedge shaped...
 ???

Baccy Man

  • Hectare
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,893
  • Powys, Wales
Re: BOTANICAL LATIN?
« Reply #5 on: March 30, 2008, 11:16:10 »
Correct cuneifolius = tapered to the base (wedge shape)

grawrc

  • Global Moderator
  • Hectare
  • *****
  • Posts: 6,583
  • Edinburgh
Re: BOTANICAL LATIN?
« Reply #6 on: March 30, 2008, 11:16:53 »
I'm guessing the second one means they're far apart and villi is hair so hairy

Baccy Man

  • Hectare
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,893
  • Powys, Wales
Re: BOTANICAL LATIN?
« Reply #7 on: March 30, 2008, 11:22:23 »
Both right grawrc, how about:

æquifolius
blephariphyllus
filifolius
« Last Edit: March 30, 2008, 11:24:42 by Baccy Man »

betula

  • Hectare
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,839
Re: BOTANICAL LATIN?
« Reply #8 on: March 30, 2008, 11:33:14 »
Aequifolius............equal leaves

saddad

  • Hectare
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,895
  • Derby, Derbyshire (Strange, but true!)
Re: BOTANICAL LATIN?
« Reply #9 on: March 30, 2008, 11:36:57 »
the last onme should mean something like leaves growing off leaves (rather than stem) as Filli is son...

betula

  • Hectare
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,839
Re: BOTANICAL LATIN?
« Reply #10 on: March 30, 2008, 11:50:09 »
The blepharophyllus with leaves fringed like eyelashes

Baccy Man

  • Hectare
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,893
  • Powys, Wales
Re: BOTANICAL LATIN?
« Reply #11 on: March 30, 2008, 12:02:18 »
Betula you're right on both words.
Saddad you are wrong I am afraid filli is Latin for son but fil means something very different & the i is just a connective vowel, think about the common name for something like juncus filiformis & you will get it.

Moving away from leaf descriptions how about:

acanthocarpus
sanguiniflorus
volubilis

Rhubarb Thrasher

  • Hectare
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,713
  • Dark Side Of The Rhubarb
Re: BOTANICAL LATIN?
« Reply #12 on: March 30, 2008, 12:06:39 »
acanthocarpus - showy seed
sanguiniflorus - red flower
volubilis - got a lot to say for itself

debster

  • Hectare
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,599
Re: BOTANICAL LATIN?
« Reply #13 on: March 30, 2008, 12:07:05 »
its all greek to me folks ;D
what clever people we have on this forum, i use a lot of latin in my job too

Baccy Man

  • Hectare
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,893
  • Powys, Wales
Re: BOTANICAL LATIN?
« Reply #14 on: March 30, 2008, 12:23:44 »
acanthocarpus - showy seed
sanguiniflorus - red flower
volubilis - got a lot to say for itself

sanguiniflorus = blood red flower. The other 2 are wrong.

betula

  • Hectare
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,839
Re: BOTANICAL LATIN?
« Reply #15 on: March 30, 2008, 12:24:43 »
acanthocarpus    a prickle or a thorn

volubilis......................winding

sanguiniflorus..............red

Hyacinth

  • Hectare
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,276
  • I love Allotments 4 All
Re: BOTANICAL LATIN?
« Reply #16 on: March 30, 2008, 12:36:37 »

volubilis - got a lot to say for itself

Spot-on! ;D

Baccy Man

  • Hectare
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,893
  • Powys, Wales
Re: BOTANICAL LATIN?
« Reply #17 on: March 30, 2008, 12:46:13 »
acanthocarpus    a prickle or a thorn

volubilis......................winding

sanguiniflorus..............red

Close enough.
acanthocarpus = prickly/spiny fruit.

Rhubarb Thrasher

  • Hectare
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,713
  • Dark Side Of The Rhubarb
Re: BOTANICAL LATIN?
« Reply #18 on: March 30, 2008, 12:48:16 »
i love latin! I'm especially fond of Psalm 127 -

 Vanum est vobis ante lucem surgere

it's a waste of time your getting up early

betula

  • Hectare
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,839
Re: BOTANICAL LATIN?
« Reply #19 on: March 30, 2008, 12:58:28 »
Thanks for those Baccy man :)

 

anything
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal