I've thought about this a lot also. There's a lot of pros and cons. Any pond's a wildlife pond really. Soil always ends up in there anyway. Pond plants generally need minimising not maximising, ie they grow strongly. You won't get a thin layer on slopes without a thick layer at the bottom. In a small pond I'd say no soil, that's from experience. But your pond is big.
Is it supposed to be ornamental as well? Plants in baskets are much easier to manage. But in a pond that size, if it's planted wisely and is going to be looked after at least a bit, you might be better off with soil. I think I'd say none in the bottom. If it's not dug yet then dig it with a lip to the shelves, then you can soil them up. Go for pockets of soil not all over coverage. A lot depends. Situation? Will it end up full of leaves? Maintenance? Will it be looked after?
As you say, opinions vary. I think a lot of pond books are written by people who just copy out what someone else said. Have a look for good information about pond edging. It all gets amazingly vague and glossed over. "Yeah it's easy, you just do it like that. Like the picture. I won't go into details there's no need". But that's where the devil is isn't it?
Some people say put turves in. Think about chemicals if you do that. Who's going to sieve the soil? Not much help I'm sorry. But good luck and remember that in nature ponds end up silting up and disappearing. End up as forests. So don't overdo the soil at any rate.