Author Topic: O C R  (Read 2223 times)

tonybloke

  • Hectare
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,811
  • Gorleston 0n sea, Norfolk
O C R
« on: March 03, 2009, 22:57:44 »
does anyone use this? if so, what do you think of it?
(optical character recognition)
You couldn't make it up!

BAK

  • Wiki Editor
  • Hectare
  • *****
  • Posts: 529
    • BK - This and That
Re: O C R
« Reply #1 on: March 04, 2009, 07:10:41 »
I have used it a handful of times, i.e. only when I have to.

It has never been 100% accurate but it has been no big deal to check the results and amend the output where necessary.

tonybloke

  • Hectare
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,811
  • Gorleston 0n sea, Norfolk
Re: O C R
« Reply #2 on: March 04, 2009, 07:37:13 »
I was thinking of using it, I've got a load of documents which need updating into a digital format. (allotment tenancy agreements, rules, membership lists, etc) ?
You couldn't make it up!

BAK

  • Wiki Editor
  • Hectare
  • *****
  • Posts: 529
    • BK - This and That
Re: O C R
« Reply #3 on: March 04, 2009, 08:08:29 »
from memory the last time I used it there were about 6 changes that I had to make to a single page.

Although it sounds a lot it was infinitely better than retyping the whole page.

Why dont you try it with a small sample initially?

Palustris

  • Hectare
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,359
Re: O C R
« Reply #4 on: March 04, 2009, 12:00:58 »
I used something similar to get my tryped out stories on to the computer. It obviously made a fair number of errors, especially as the typing was old and faded, but it took little time to use a Word processing program to check the results and was far easier than typing the whole thing in.
Gardening is the great leveller.

redimp

  • Hectare
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,928
  • Colonia Domitiana Lindensium, Flavia Caesariensis
Re: O C R
« Reply #5 on: March 06, 2009, 18:37:24 »
I use it to prepare shared texts for the interactive whiteboard.  With a good quality original, often no amendments needed and not many per page of less good quality.  A big time saver for me - I use Textbridge
Lotty @ Lincoln (Lat:53.24, Long:-0.52, HASL:30m)

http://www.abicabeauty

terrier

  • Acre
  • ****
  • Posts: 400
  • North Wales
Re: O C R
« Reply #6 on: March 07, 2009, 23:23:30 »
I've used OCR lite versions bundled with printer software and it's been useless, but using the full paid for pro versions, with a bit of fine tuning, is excellent. Hope this helps.

tonybloke

  • Hectare
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,811
  • Gorleston 0n sea, Norfolk
Re: O C R
« Reply #7 on: March 08, 2009, 23:46:17 »
Having a go with ABBYY fine reader, pretty good so far!! ;)
You couldn't make it up!

terrier

  • Acre
  • ****
  • Posts: 400
  • North Wales
Re: O C R
« Reply #8 on: March 08, 2009, 23:52:20 »
Having a go with ABBYY fine reader, pretty good so far!! ;)

That's the one I tried. There's a big difference between the lite version and the full pro version.

Tee Gee

  • Hectare
  • *****
  • Posts: 6,930
  • Huddersfield - Light humus rich soil
    • The Gardener's Almanac
Re: O C R
« Reply #9 on: March 09, 2009, 10:49:43 »
I find Abby fine reader pro an excellent bit of software!

Beats epson 'smart panel' hands down (this was free software that came with my scanner.)

So I guess you gets what you pay for!

asbean

  • Hectare
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,411
  • Winchester, Hants
Re: O C R
« Reply #10 on: March 09, 2009, 11:52:43 »
My blind friends have ABBYY pro version, works a treat for them and they use it all the time
The Tuscan Beaneater

 

anything
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal