Allotments 4 All

Produce => Wildlife forum => Topic started by: Georgie on September 29, 2006, 14:03:59

Title: Fungus ID please
Post by: Georgie on September 29, 2006, 14:03:59
Found this huge mushroom/toadstool growing on its own in my border today.  Something has clearly been enjoying muching on it but does anyone know what it is and is it edible?  Cheers.  G x

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y30/georgie_girl15/Fungus.jpg)

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y30/georgie_girl15/Fungus2.jpg)

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y30/georgie_girl15/Fungus3.jpg)

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y30/georgie_girl15/Fungus4.jpg)

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y30/georgie_girl15/Fungus5.jpg)
Title: Re: Fungus ID please
Post by: ACE on September 29, 2006, 15:40:24
An old boy told me once if it stains your fingers yellow don't eat it, and if you are still not sure try it on your partner first ;D

But seriously it looks un-edible. I believe there are not many deadly poisonous ones but there are quite a few that will upset your stomach.
Title: Re: Fungus ID please
Post by: Truffle on September 29, 2006, 15:48:25
Don't eat it!!!!!!!

It looks a little bit like a destroying angel- quite posienous.

I did a seach fro destoying angel and this turned up:
http://www.rogersmushrooms.com/gallery/DisplayBlock~bid~5564.asp

Truff
Title: Re: Fungus ID please
Post by: Robert_Brenchley on September 29, 2006, 16:47:23
With no trace of veils, it could well be Lyophyllum connatum, which is edible when young, provided it's cooked. But as a general safety rule, be extremely cautious of any 'mushroom' with white gills. The last thing you want to do is end up eating Amanita virosa, typically a woodland species,  by mistake!
Title: Re: Fungus ID please
Post by: Georgie on September 29, 2006, 17:30:23
Many thanks for all your replies.  I've popped it back where I found it so that whatever has been enjoying it can continue to do so whilst me and the OH remain safe.   ;D

G x
Title: Re: Fungus ID please
Post by: mark_h on October 06, 2006, 19:03:07
Possibly a Leucoagaricus species.