Allotments 4 All

Produce => Edible Plants => Topic started by: Borderers1951 on July 28, 2017, 06:13:45

Title: Beans - large or small?
Post by: Borderers1951 on July 28, 2017, 06:13:45
My beans (both runner and French) are now starting to produce pods in large numbers.  This is purely our personal choice but we pick when the pods are a little under full size in the case of French beans and still quite small in the case of runners.  Being of the post-wear generation, both my wife and myself look with horror at large, tough, stringy pods.  We put it down to a knock-on effect from wartime food, which had to be grown to be as bulky as possible to fill stomachs.

Does anyone else prefer smaller and more  tender beans to the large ones many seem to prefer?
Title: Re: Beans - large or small?
Post by: pumkinlover on July 28, 2017, 08:42:52
Totally agree. We really only like the young small beans and if they are picked regular they keep cropping. OH is not post war but feels the same.
Title: Re: Beans - large or small?
Post by: Jayb on July 28, 2017, 09:06:28
Agreen tender beans are the only way to go  :sunny:

Runners are my favourites  :love10:
But give me a stringy bean and it sends me retching! I try and pick as soon as they get to fully formed or just under and eat fresh, I find they can go stringy if kept in the fridge to long. Anything looking a little old or too large and heaven forbid lumpy, goes straight to compost.

However everything changed and I've fallen in love with the Greasy and Fall beans that I've tried, they have all been delicious. Most can be eaten at the green bean stage, also the full stage (when pods are still green and tender and the seed inside is plump and near on fully formed) and also left a little longer to shell for the plump beans inside. They do have side strings, which are more like zippers and easy to remove, the actual green bean (apart from the side strings) remains tender and doesn't become fibrous as some regular French and Runner beans do. Yum!
Title: Re: Beans - large or small?
Post by: Borlotti on July 28, 2017, 11:54:15
I pick my runner beans small, they are delicious, hopefully there will be soon today as we had had plenty of rain.
Title: Re: Beans - large or small?
Post by: Tee Gee on July 28, 2017, 13:33:48
I don't grow runner beans for that very reason ...today they can be lovely tomorrow they are stringy, add to that if I miss some today they are like ropes tomorrow...cure....don't grow them...I prefer climbing french beans...pencil shaped no strings and they crop equally as,  if not better, than runner beans, especially Cobra.

Then add to that in the late fifties I was in digs and the landlady used to grow them meaning in the growing season my dinner plate was piled high with them, I think this is the main reason I went off them.

 I could say a lot more about those dinners but I do not want to put anyone of you off yours!
Title: Re: Beans - large or small?
Post by: Digeroo on July 28, 2017, 18:26:48
I certainly pick my runners young before they go stringy.  Any that I miss and get too big end up in the compost bin.  There seems to be a fine balance between flavour and stringy.  Too small no taste, too big too stringy.  I certainly despair of the supermarket ones which I think have been picked several days too late.   
My mother used to put beans through a gadget with metal prongs and it if did not go through easily she threw the bean away.  My mother in law grew runner beans right through the war and hers were never stringy and always delicious. 
I also enjoy the flat French ones and I am particularly pleased with Pantheon.  According to Mr Fothergill they come before the runners, but I have not found that.  They were very slow to start flowering.  But now are dripping in beans.
Looking forward soon to Marvel of Venice.  And I like Mrs Lewis,s very small and young.
Title: Re: Beans - large or small?
Post by: Duke Ellington on July 28, 2017, 18:32:19
I only grow French beans and Borlotti beans. The borlotti beans I grow to a size that I can pod them, blanch and freeze for winter soups.

Duke
Title: Re: Beans - large or small?
Post by: johhnyco15 on July 28, 2017, 20:39:58
i like mine by the barrow load
Title: Re: Beans - large or small?
Post by: Paulh on July 28, 2017, 21:08:51
Absolutely agree. I pick runner beans at about 9" long, when the skin starts to roughen and an edge forms on the pod. I also grow climbing French bean "Cobra" but these have different taste and texture and a shorter season, so I wouldn't give up the runner beans for them. And I grow Borlotti beans for the beans rather than the pods. Things were late going for me this year because of a holiday in early May so they are only starting now - and I'm going away again for a week ...
Title: Re: Beans - large or small?
Post by: strawberry1 on July 28, 2017, 21:20:01
small for an instant meal, then longer beans to shred and cook for winter storage in ratatouille. Never stringy ones. Only having six plants makes it easy to find the beans and they, moonlight, are producing masses of tender lovely tasting beans
Title: Re: Beans - large or small?
Post by: Tee Gee on July 28, 2017, 22:09:40
Quote
also grow climbing French bean "Cobra" but these have different taste and texture and a shorter season, so I wouldn't give up the runner beans for them.

Different taste Yes! But in my opinion a better taste,and I grow two crops a year under cover thus extending the season

The first  crop is ready earlier and the second crop  under cover crops later so I get a nice long season of fresh beans, and I freeze the surplus.

I also think that the frozen ones taste better than runners after they have been frozen

BTW My second crop is ready for planting out next week

If we are going to continue getting these mild winters I might have a go at three crops this year.

Call it a case of nothing ventured nothing gained.
Title: Re: Beans - large or small?
Post by: Silverleaf on July 28, 2017, 23:22:32
Once runners get stringy I leave them a bit longer until the actual beans are a decent size for shelling out. Yum!
Title: Re: Beans - large or small?
Post by: Vinlander on July 29, 2017, 11:10:58
I agree that all bean pods should be picked before they get any hint of stringiness, but I prefer the taste of runners when they are smaller than that - about the same size I'd pick a french.

I also do what others have said and towards the end of the season (provided the second crop of french are still going) I let any runners that got too big continue to get lumpy and then go for the beans inside - they taste best before the colour shows (as 'flageolets'), they are OK larger too but I dislike the colour in stews (especially for guests - "wtf are these?" seems to be the standard response) - that's why I always grow white seeded types that are less alarming . The white flowers also suffer less from whatever bites through the red flowers (cutter bees? or an actual pest?).

Incidentally the yellow hook/prawn climbing french beans are stringless even when they have gone lumpy - almost to the point where you'd normally shell them and eat the seeds. I was told this when I was given the seeds and it's definitely noticeable. I can't guarantee the green version is the same - they are harder to spot when picking anyway.

Can anyone suggest any others of normal shape with this advantage? especially any purple or mottled types?

Cheers.
Title: Re: Beans - large or small?
Post by: laurieuk on July 29, 2017, 15:32:27
I grow about four different lots of beans so that we keep picking for a long time' I generally grow ENORMA which get to about 15 inches before showing any sign if stringiness. I do quite a bit of judging so get used to spotting any sins of being old. Providing the beans are fast growing they stay good for a few days. It is surprizing how old some people will try and show them.
Title: Re: Beans - large or small?
Post by: galina on July 29, 2017, 15:59:06


Incidentally the yellow hook/prawn climbing french beans are stringless even when they have gone lumpy - almost to the point where you'd normally shell them and eat the seeds. I was told this when I was given the seeds and it's definitely noticeable. I can't guarantee the green version is the same - they are harder to spot when picking anyway.

Can anyone suggest any others of normal shape with this advantage? especially any purple or mottled types?

Cheers.

As Jayb said, any of the Greasy beans fall into that category, but they do have strong strings.  :wave:
http://www.heirlooms.org/store/c1/Featured_Products.html
and many other sources, they are getting quite a following.
Title: Re: Beans - large or small?
Post by: Tee Gee on July 29, 2017, 16:52:46
Quote
It is surprising how old some people will try and show them.


But they are soon found out if it is a condition of the judging to snap one


(http://i222.photobucket.com/albums/dd27/tgalmanac/Show%20Exhibits/Runnerbeans.jpg) (http://s222.photobucket.com/user/tgalmanac/media/Show%20Exhibits/Runnerbeans.jpg.html)
Title: Re: Beans - large or small?
Post by: strawberry1 on July 29, 2017, 22:06:02
my freezer is full. just have enough room left for raspberries and I am done. I made another huge batch of beans disguised as ratatouille and I have to stop, I think I already have enough for the whole winter but I have to keep on picking, in order to keep producing young beans. Pickings will be destined for compost, I never feel guilty as it is just back to the soil. Everyone has beans in my village and family are too far away and I am not brining or making bean picalilli, those days are over for good. Beans twice a day, cold beans with salad, it`ll be beans for breakfast soon. The tops were full of bumble bees this morning
Title: Re: Beans - large or small?
Post by: strawberry1 on July 30, 2017, 10:12:55
I had at least 2 lbs of small to medium beans this morning and need a bean rest, so every tiny bean,  that I could see, has been pulled off. Another three or four days and there will be masses more, they were full of bumble bees
Title: Re: Beans - large or small?
Post by: laurieuk on July 30, 2017, 10:20:58
Hi Tee Gee,  Always start by counting then snapping, I once saw maximum points awarded to peas without any open. To award max points in my opinion every pod would need to be open to make sure the peas were perfect..
Title: Re: Beans - large or small?
Post by: Digeroo on July 30, 2017, 10:36:21
Quote
especially any purple or mottled types?

One of my favourite beans is Mrs Lewis's Purple podded.  Produces loads of purple beans lovely at every stage.   They came from Heritage seed library.  They are quite big before they go stringy.   They are more cold hardly than white bean varieties.  Each flower head produces about 12 beans so it tends to drip with them.

In the past I would have offered some seeds but postage has increased.  As soon as the packet is lumpy it cannot go as a letter so the post office charge vast amounts. 
Title: Re: Beans - large or small?
Post by: Tee Gee on July 30, 2017, 10:55:51
Quote
Always start by counting then snapping, I once saw maximum points awarded to peas without any open. To award max points in my opinion every pod would need to be open to make sure the peas were perfect..

Totally agree Laurie

I have been NAS'd for not counting.

I remember once I was showing at our Chrysant society show because I did not count how many stems I had in the vase.

It was a five stem class and as a rule I used to take 6 or7 stems with me in case one or more did not travel well.

That year I was a bit short of time and I set up my vase as I usually do but silly me I didn't notice I had put 6 stems in the vase hence the NAS.

The main reason I liked the '5' class with anything  was if something didn't travel well or was damaged I could always enter the 3 classes.

I was even known to enter the 'single' class for the same reason.

What I didn't like though was if the winner of the 'Best in Show' was from a single class.

With only one item it meant it could be as near perfect as you can get but with a three or five vase you never get them all perfect, very good Yes! but not as perfect as the single item,

IMHO this is very unfair but it  usually states  in the rules;  " Best exhibit in show" and as it is an exhibit it is entitled to be considered for the ultimate prize.

Ah! those were the days!
Title: Re: Beans - large or small?
Post by: Tulipa on July 30, 2017, 12:59:31
I'm another fan of using the larger beans podded and cooked as broad beans, yummy ;)
Title: Re: Beans - large or small?
Post by: Tulipa on July 30, 2017, 12:59:45
I'm another fan of using the larger beans podded and cooked as broad beans, yummy ;)
Title: Re: Beans - large or small?
Post by: Silverleaf on July 30, 2017, 17:21:44
Hi Tee Gee,  Always start by counting then snapping, I once saw maximum points awarded to peas without any open. To award max points in my opinion every pod would need to be open to make sure the peas were perfect..

It must be gutting if you happen to get a pea maggot in one of them. I've lost count of the number of times I've picked a pod which looks perfectly normal only to find it has a wriggly little squatter munching away...
Title: Re: Beans - large or small?
Post by: Vinlander on July 30, 2017, 17:47:27
As Jayb said, any of the Greasy beans fall into that category, but they do have strong strings.  :wave:
http://www.heirlooms.org/store/c1/Featured_Products.html
and many other sources, they are getting quite a following.
The hook beans have no string at all until they are quite lumpy - though the lump (& seed) in the middle is always biggest.

I have often thought while stringing beans that if the string was a little stronger, and the rest of the bean a little less stringy then they'd be worth growing if I couldn't grow truly stringless ones .

I didn't know someone had bred this advantage into a race of beans - though it sounds more like an advantage for shelling than eating green - are the "greasy beans" really for eating green? If so the name is a bit offputting - presumably once they are boiled the greasyness disappears - but does the same thing happen with steaming?

Cheers.
Title: Re: Beans - large or small?
Post by: galina on July 31, 2017, 06:19:36

I didn't know someone had bred this advantage into a race of beans - though it sounds more like an advantage for shelling than eating green - are the "greasy beans" really for eating green? If so the name is a bit offputting - presumably once they are boiled the greasyness disappears - but does the same thing happen with steaming?

Cheers.

Vinlander, they are called 'greasy' because the pods are hairless, which makes them look shiny.  There is no grease involved at all, it's just a name.  :wave:
Title: Re: Beans - large or small?
Post by: Vinlander on July 31, 2017, 08:55:49
Vinlander, they are called 'greasy' because the pods are hairless, which makes them look shiny.  There is no grease involved at all, it's just a name.  :wave:

Well, thanks Galina! - serves me right for overthinking it again - I'm now wallowing in nostalgia about the time when names were just names and everything wasn't dominated by PR and spin.

I was going to say PC too but to be fair that started as an improvement - though we only spent about 5 minutes at the happy medium before hitting the buffers at the other end. We spent a few happy years around the midpoint of health & safety, (probably because the costs temporarily damped the swing). Why does everything have to be an insane pendulum?

There I go again...

Cheers.
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal