Allotments 4 All

General => The Shed => Topic started by: OllieC on June 27, 2008, 17:38:18

Title: Pedant's Corner
Post by: OllieC on June 27, 2008, 17:38:18
Anyone?
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on June 27, 2008, 18:07:35
don't understand. Is this for people on the Sex Offenders Register?

I love saving "Data ARE...", but then I also say "The Team ARE...." Is that what you're on about?
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: OllieC on June 27, 2008, 18:45:21
Inspired by a correction saddad made to Barnie the Owl, IIRC... I just thought it would be nice for some of us to get certain pedantry out of our system(s)... see topic on Blossom End Rot...

Now, in terms of the points you raise RT, I think it should be called the "Sex Offender's Register" to give a greater degree of ownership & instill a sense of responsibility in the aforementioned offenders.
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on June 27, 2008, 19:09:26
I did wonder about the apostrophe. You envisage something like the big book on "This is your life"? Perhaps we should move on to something else.

I love semi-colons

http://www.videojug.com/film/how-to-use-colons-and-semi-colons (http://www.videojug.com/film/how-to-use-colons-and-semi-colons)
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: asbean on June 27, 2008, 20:51:39
I'm an English teacher. It's been a long week, so don't get me started  :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'(
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Georgie on June 27, 2008, 21:01:41
I'm an English teacher. It's been a long week, so don't get me started  :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'(

Superfluous comma after 'week' I'd say. ;)

G x
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Palustris on June 27, 2008, 21:07:57
The Pedants are revolting!
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: asbean on June 27, 2008, 21:33:39
And so are you  ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: valmarg on June 27, 2008, 21:42:09
I love saving "Data ARE...", but then I also say "The Team ARE...." Is that what you're on about?

Yes, because datum is.

You are wrong with 'the team are'.  A team is singular, therefore the team 'is'.   Members of the team 'are'.

valmarg


Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Melbourne12 on June 27, 2008, 21:44:03
I still think that "simplistic" should be reserved for descriptions of herbal remedies, and that "busses" are smacking kisses, not a form of public transport.

But what do I know?
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Palustris on June 27, 2008, 21:51:35
I must of mist that. Your rite their!
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on June 27, 2008, 22:02:54
I love saving "Data ARE...", but then I also say "The Team ARE...." Is that what you're on about?

Yes, because datum is.

You are wrong with 'the team are'.  A team is singular, therefore the team 'is'.   Members of the team 'are'.

valmarg




no that's what I mean. Data is plural. Team is singular.  I choose to recognise one but not the other. etc etc
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: grawrc on June 27, 2008, 22:24:41
Except that, like "family", "team" is a collective noun and so can be used with either a singular or a plural verb.

Do you pronounce it day-ta or dah-ta? ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: lorna on June 27, 2008, 22:37:22
Crikey no more posts from me cos me English ain't velly good ;D
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: valmarg on June 27, 2008, 22:44:20
Except that, like "family", "team" is a collective noun and so can be used with either a singular or a plural verb.

Do you pronounce it day-ta or dah-ta? ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

I say tomAto, you say tomaato
I say potAto you say potato,
lets call the whole thing off ;D

valmarg
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: betula on June 27, 2008, 23:04:02
Except that, like "family", "team" is a collective noun and so can be used with either a singular or a plural verb.

Do you pronounce it day-ta or dah-ta? ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

I think it should strictly speaking be dah-ta because the root of the noun datum is from the Latin verb dah-re (spelt dare ),to give.....this is via my husband but he is also a self-confessed pedant! :)...................I am not
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: grawrc on June 27, 2008, 23:23:20
...but if you're a trekkie... rofl



.. and in that case only singular verbs would be appropriate, although I believe that on one episode he has a daughter!  ;D ;D
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on June 28, 2008, 05:58:48
no i'm sorry,  if you think "the team are" is right, then we're all going to hell in a handcart
Nothing wrong with a split infinitive - it just became a problem when we tried to apply Latin grammar rules to English

on the subject of pronunciation- there was a nice new word in the Daily Telegraph last week - someone who is obsessed with buses and coaches is called an "omnibolist". Trouble is, I can't drop this nugget into conversations until I know whether it's pronounced omni-boll-ist, om-nibblist.  ;D
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: grawrc on June 28, 2008, 06:52:31
From wikipedia ( my italics):
Metonymic merging of grammatical number

Main articles: Synesis and Plurale tantum
Two good examples of collective nouns are "team" and "government," which are both words referring to groups of (usually) people. Both "team" and "government" are count nouns. (Consider: "one team," "two teams," "most teams"; "one government," "two governments," "many governments"). However, confusion often stems from the fact that plural verb forms can often be used with the singular forms of these count nouns (for example: "The team have finished the project"). Conversely, singular verb forms can often be used with nouns ending in "-s" that were once considered plural (for example: "Physics is my favorite academic subject"). This apparent "number mismatch" is actually a quite natural and logical feature of human language, and its mechanism is a subtle metonymic shift in the thoughts underlying the words.
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on June 28, 2008, 08:13:35
Wiki seems to say it's OK because a lot of people do it

so this is OK - "the Manchester United team are overpaid"

but also "This packet of hob-nobs are delicious"

how's that for a subtle metonymic shift
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: GrannieAnnie on June 28, 2008, 12:46:20
We've inherited, I believe, from you Brits a disturbing phrase which has never seemed correct to me (though I'm no pedant). How can "he went missing" ever be correct? It has become as common as weeds now.
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: calendula on June 28, 2008, 13:38:47
he is missing + he went missing = present and past, either way he still missed the point  ;D
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Palustris on June 28, 2008, 13:56:23
And after reading that I shall have to go and boil the kettle for a cup of tea. Or perhaps I should boil the water in a kettle?
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on June 28, 2008, 15:13:03
he went missing sounds fine to me, mind you I went missing years ago

GrannieAnnie - the one that get us here is "gotten". Surely not one of ours we stopped using? Did you get it from the Germans or the Dutch?

I keep asking for a packet of green cigarette papers, and they are always white
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: GrannieAnnie on June 28, 2008, 17:30:45
he went missing sounds fine to me, mind you I went missing years ago

GrannieAnnie - the one that get us here is "gotten". Surely not one of ours we stopped using? Did you get it from the Germans or the Dutch?
Here the past participle for "get" is gotten.  I have no idea of its origin- could easily be German we're such a mishmash of heritages. And we usually delete the word "have" since it is inferred and would waste one breath of air whilst (that's British) causing more sound pollution.;D
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: OllieC on June 28, 2008, 17:36:45
Never use one word when ten will do the job just as well!
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: GrannieAnnie on June 28, 2008, 17:52:53
Never use one word when ten will do the job just as well!
Oh my, last night we sat through a speech by someone who actually believed that saying. It about slowed the retirement party to a screeching halt.
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Ishard on June 28, 2008, 18:52:30
And how do you 'make a loss' when talking about finance?

Slightly off topic but I really hate it when people say Canadian geese for a gaggle of them. NO!! They are Canada geese.
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: telboy on June 28, 2008, 20:50:47
Excuse me for poking my big nose in here.

May I, with respect, request a countrywide referendum to ban the use of the following words:

'basically'
'obviously'
'absolutely'
from the English language.

Thank you in anticipation!
 8)

Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: asbean on June 28, 2008, 22:43:26
Or "koi carp"

We wouldn't say "goldfish goldfish", or "blackbird blackbird" :( :( :( :( :(
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: OllieC on June 28, 2008, 22:56:52
Yet, with no intentional irony, we say naan bread...
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Amazin on June 28, 2008, 23:23:46
And I happily chunter that I'm growing Poona Kheera cucumber

(Kheera is Hindi for cucumber)
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on June 29, 2008, 00:20:43
sorry GrannieAnnie - we pick up most things American, but gotten is just so wrong, even our youth of today don't use it
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: GrannieAnnie on June 29, 2008, 02:09:30
sorry GrannieAnnie - we pick up most things American, but gotten is just so wrong, even our youth of today don't use it
I wasn't suggesting you adopt "gotten" in England, only stating what is considered American English. I'd rather our countries kept their own unique ways instead of exporting it. Except for- what's his name, the actor.

Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Hyacinth on June 29, 2008, 07:01:19
he went missing sounds fine to me, mind you I went missing years ago

GrannieAnnie - the one that get us here is "gotten". Surely not one of ours we stopped using?



'Tis so! We imported it to America. Blame the Pilgrim Fathers :o

Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on June 29, 2008, 07:51:50
yes, we have ill-gotten gains of course

another thing - as we are a small country and things change fast, and you are a large one and things change slowly, the idea is that you still have people speaking the language of, or  at least, the accent of, Shakespeare - Google-meister suggests they're in the Carolinas. How cool is that?

"fear no more the heat o'the sun,
nor the furious winter's rages.... how's that in a Carolina accent?
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Ishard on June 29, 2008, 08:34:48
As dear old Winston Chruchill said 'Two nations divided by a common language' is exactly how the US and UK are.  ;D
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: saddad on June 29, 2008, 09:29:34
Sorry I've missed all this, down to one 'puter here so not getting on much! Just knew I'd have a mention, didn't realise I'd started it!!
We have no problem with forget ... forgotten, so what's the problem with gotten? Having just marked some gcse scripts I can assure you it is alive and well is some parts of the country. Yes it is a germanic declension, as are most of our common words. Anglo-Saxon (?) and Saxony is where exactly?...
 ;D
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Hyacinth on June 29, 2008, 15:50:35
.....something else we imported to the USA where it's still alive and well AND I WANT IT BACK, please,.....is......
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'

the
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
z

Had you realiz(s)ed that?

My mate'n'me's gotta Save the Zed Society, 'cept that he calls it the "Save the Zee Society"...  ;D


Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on June 29, 2008, 17:24:05
perhaps they'll do us a job lot and thrown in all those u's they don't u's, and we can give them some f's for them to u's when they mean ph
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: valmarg on June 29, 2008, 19:41:25
As dear old Winston Chruchill said 'Two nations divided by a common language' is exactly how the US and UK are.  ;D

According to my Oxford Dictionary of Quotations, the possible originator of this quote is George Bernard Shaw, being the pedant that I am. ;D ;D

valmarg
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: valmarg on June 29, 2008, 19:53:52
.....something else we imported to the USA where it's still alive and well AND I WANT IT BACK, please,.....is...
]z[/b]

Oh dear, A_M, I am going to be a real, total absolute and utter pedant here.  We do not import to the USA, we export. ;D

valmarg


Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: GrannieAnnie on June 29, 2008, 20:07:06
yes, we have ill-gotten gains of course

another thing - as we are a small country and things change fast, and you are a large one and things change slowly, the idea is that you still have people speaking the language of, or  at least, the accent of, Shakespeare - Google-meister suggests they're in the Carolinas. How cool is that?

"fear no more the heat o'the sun,
nor the furious winter's rages.... how's that in a Carolina accent?

Enlighten me. What precisely has changed fast in England?
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on June 29, 2008, 20:23:21
I mean, or rather people who know about these things mean, that the way we speak in Britain changes a lot, much more quickly than in America,
so some of your accents "may" be closer to the way we spoke (or other immigrant communities) hundreds of years ago

http://everything2.com/node/744955 (http://everything2.com/node/744955)
pinch of salt needed perhaps

A very brief sketch of a few major American accents and the groups of immigrants that contributed to some of their their major characteristics:
New England = East Anglian Puritans
Midwest, (such as Chicago) = German immigrants
Northern Midwest (Wisconsin and Minnesota) = German and Scandinavian
Parts of New York City = Italian, Irish, and Eastern European immigrants
Southern seaboard (such as Carolinas, Georgia) = West Country English (This was Shakespeare's English)
Appalachia (notably Tennesee and Kentucky) = Scotch-Irish immigrants from Northern Ireland (This accent is what Americans hear in Country Music)
Deep South = perhaps some influence from West African languages via slaves (although this is still hotly debated)
California - Californian and other western accents are especially interesting, if difficult to analyze because the region has recently had a massive influx of transplants from all over the US. One theory is that the California accent tends to neutralize the more extreme or unusual features of other regional dialects, creating a sort of bland, unoffensive homogenous mix. This process is supported by Hollywood's disdain for anyone with a strange accent - most movie stars and TV personalities have to learn a certain type of neutral accent


Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Emagggie on June 29, 2008, 21:47:19
My head hurts.
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Hyacinth on June 29, 2008, 21:50:30
Valmarg...... :-[ ::)

 ;D
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: star on June 30, 2008, 00:42:04
Grannie Annie said........"Enlighten me, what precisely has changed fast in England?"




I guess the weather, mostly ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: asbean on June 30, 2008, 00:47:40
Yes, we can get all four seasons in one day  :o :o :o :o :o
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: GrannieAnnie on June 30, 2008, 02:25:08
Rhubarb Thrasher, I made the mistake of trying to quickly read  the article you posted which lead me on to additional articles by a Frenchman on how to pronounce an "R" in America, etc. Half an hour later... I'm still reading interesting and complex stuff.  Accents are fascinating, and I cannot resist asking complete strangers where they're from (not good manners, I know). Whether or not our accents are changing rapidly is up to discussion. My feeling solely based on conversations is that folks are usually proud of their local dialect, unless they are trying to escape from their origins, so why change?
 
this whole topic reminds me of "My Fair Lady." the Rhine in Spine stays Minely on the Plines. I think she's got it!

Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on June 30, 2008, 06:11:14
that piece had someting about the Bostonian accent- that it was an urban myth that they had deliberately tried to copy the English accent in the 19th century (and failed miserably - like Dick Van d**e in Mary Poppins). We have a tame Bostonian on the Tv here, and don't he talk funny though. Is that right? Bostonians talk really strangely?
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: GrannieAnnie on June 30, 2008, 10:53:17
Yes, they have  dropped the "R" in the ends of words so "car" is "kah", but not only in Boston. We know a couple families that moved here from Maine and they speak the same way. 

The article you posted only scratches the surface of the complexity of accents here which it stated at the beginning.  Eg. In our tiny state at the north end my name is pronounced "Anne" with a long A but at the southern end you might hear  it with two syllables: "A-yun."  We pronounce "water" as "wah-derr" but 45 min. away in Philadelphia you might hear "wuh-derr". We always teased my mother who was Pennsylvania Dutch raised about 2 hrs drive from here for pronouncing "hotdog" with the emphasis on the second syllable and with an upswing in the voice making it always sound like a question.
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: OllieC on June 30, 2008, 10:56:51
Words cannot describe the disappointment I felt when I discovered that the septics pronounce Basil & Oregano correctly... and we're wrong!
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: GrannieAnnie on June 30, 2008, 10:59:28
Words cannot describe the disappointment I felt when I discovered that the septics pronounce Basil & Oregano correctly... and we're wrong!
I'm sorry the skeptics went septic.
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: GrannieAnnie on June 30, 2008, 11:14:21
.....something else we imported to the USA where it's still alive and well AND I WANT IT BACK, please,.....is......
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'

the
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
z

Had you realiz(s)ed that?

My mate'n'me's gotta Save the Zed Society, 'cept that he calls it the "Save the Zee Society"...  ;D



When did the Zee become endangered? Seems to be alive and well here.
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: OllieC on June 30, 2008, 11:18:25
Words cannot describe the disappointment I felt when I discovered that the septics pronounce Basil & Oregano correctly... and we're wrong!
I'm sorry the skeptics went septic.

What would a skeptic tank be useful for though?  ;)
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: GrannieAnnie on June 30, 2008, 11:22:04
Words cannot describe the disappointment I felt when I discovered that the septics pronounce Basil & Oregano correctly... and we're wrong!
I'm sorry the skeptics went septic.

What would a skeptic tank be useful for though?  ;)
A lovely idea- put all skeptics  in a tank to bother each other. ;D
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on June 30, 2008, 11:36:52
My last post was censored! Dick seems to be OK, but not the other word.

we have a thing here, which of course you do too, that certain accents suggest things about the character of the speaker. London accents are untrustworthy. Scottish accents (but not Glasgow) suggest proffessionalism (they are probably a doctor). Birmingham (Ozzie Osbourne) suggest stupidity - mind you someone from Birmingham said recently that anyone hearing  a Brum accent automatically has zero expectations, so that if they can string two words together, they're taken for a genius. A Liverpool accent is a good thing (if you remember the Beatles) and a bad thing otherwise (drug dealers and car thieves). Manchester is the same as Liverpool, minus the beatles and the sense of humour. A west country accent is for yokels - the leader of Britain's failed mission to Mars had a strong West Country accent, so you knew it was going to end in disaster - this man isn't a rocket scientist! He should be driving a tractor!. A Yorkshire accent is probably a good thing though it also suggests bloody-mindedness and a general bolshie attitude. My favourite accent is the Geordie (newcastle) accent. For some reason it makes women sound really sexy, and when a man speaks it, everything he says sound funny (in a good way)
Have I missed offending anyone?

I have no accent by the way (of course)
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: GrannieAnnie on June 30, 2008, 11:56:21
My last post was censored! Dick seems to be OK, but not the other word.

we have a thing here, which of course you do too, that certain accents suggest things about the character of the speaker. London accents are untrustworthy. Scottish accents (but not Glasgow) suggest proffessionalism (they are probably a doctor). Birmingham (Ozzie Osbourne) suggest stupidity - mind you someone from Birmingham said recently that anyone hearing  a Brum accent automatically has zero expectations, so that if they can string two words together, they're taken for a genius. A Liverpool accent is a good thing (if you remember the Beatles) and a bad thing otherwise (drug dealers and car thieves). Manchester is the same as Liverpool, minus the beatles and the sense of humour. A west country accent is for yokels - the leader of Britain's failed mission to Mars had a strong West Country accent, so you knew it was going to end in disaster - this man isn't a rocket scientist! He should be driving a tractor!. A Yorkshire accent is probably a good thing though it also suggests bloody-mindedness and a general bolshie attitude. My favourite accent is the Geordie (newcastle) accent. For some reason it makes women sound really sexy, and when a man speaks it, everything he says sound funny (in a good way)
Have I missed offending anyone?

I have no accent by the way (of course)
Since we're not familiar with all those areas, I guess we're not as prejudiced as you against them. Here I'd say people with a southern accent often don't sound too bright, also too sugary, both of course complete, off-course nonsense.
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on June 30, 2008, 12:23:24
no i'm not prejudiced. It was meant to be funny, but with just the tiniest grain of truth. I moved to Cornwall when I was about 7, from Liverpool, and they had be doing the readings in the Methodist Chapel, because they thought I sounded posh! If that isn't the funniest thing
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: GrannieAnnie on June 30, 2008, 14:36:11
no i'm not prejudiced. It was meant to be funny, but with just the tiniest grain of truth. I moved to Cornwall when I was about 7, from Liverpool, and they had be doing the readings in the Methodist Chapel, because they thought I sounded posh! If that isn't the funniest thing
Yes, I took it as humorous. Saying "prejudiced" was a bit too strong but couldn't think of another suitable word...an estrogen deficiency moment. ::)
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Emagggie on June 30, 2008, 16:06:12
....and the contents of my cranium are still causing me some discomfort.
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Hyacinth on June 30, 2008, 18:45:54
Right! Back to "Import/Export".....my mind today in freefall  at work....dangerous situations, both.... ;D

And my thought on this topic was that how can I have got this SO WRONG? :-[

And then I concluded (or justified in my own inimicable fashion).....that I didn't 8) ;)

To export = to me, the transfer of a commodity, under the aegis of a dealer, of one thing from one country to another. That is export.....

To say "we imported "(blah-di-blah, in this case the speech prevalent at the time...)" to me signifies that we took it with us .

And that, I offer up, is the difference.....

Furthermore! (and yep! it was a long and hard 6hrs work under unaccustomed sun)......I then pondered if I had been right in saying "imported TO to the US" rather than "imported INTO......"

.....and decided that I was 8)

(no surprises there, then ;D).....

I concluded that the "in" of the word "into" was superfluous, cos the word "import" provided the "in" but in an 'im"-type fashion?

And then I realis(z)ed that I'd done enough work with toxic weedkillers at close quarters for many hours - and I came home  ;D ;D ;D




Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Hyacinth on June 30, 2008, 19:06:16
Accents, or the way we speak today....

Yes, I think they're changing - and not only I think so,  but Our Esteemed Old Lady of Broadcasting has sez so too, so who am I to argue  ::)

Out of the window is the 'cut-glass' RP pronunciation, which signified a clear division between "us" and "them" (or "them" and "us"?) and IN is a softer middle-of-the-road pronunciation which blurs the boundaries....

.....innit??



Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: GrannieAnnie on June 30, 2008, 19:06:27
Alishka, next time just say "smuggled."
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Hyacinth on June 30, 2008, 19:09:01
.....something else we imported to the USA where it's still alive and well AND I WANT IT BACK, please,.....is......
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'

the
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
z

Had you realiz(s)ed that?

My mate'n'me's gotta Save the Zed Society, 'cept that he calls it the "Save the Zee Society"...  ;D



When did the Zee become endangered? Seems to be alive and well here.
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Hyacinth on June 30, 2008, 19:21:49
Point is........the 'Z' was an import....(ie taken INTO the US by Settlers?).......which we're now casting aside, as without value per se and an inconvenience on a modern keyboard.........?...... ;) ;D

The Z is British and so it should remain!!!!

An So Sez All of Uz!!
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on June 30, 2008, 19:27:09
we say zed. The Americans say zee (which is also British), or you could say IZZARD. How cool is that? Eddie Zed
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: valmarg on June 30, 2008, 20:26:33
Oh dear A_M, I see what you mean about exporting into the USA.  It's a real pedant's quandary.  I tend to go along with GrannieAnnie, and would use the term smuggled ;D ;D

valmarg


Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Hyacinth on June 30, 2008, 20:40:27
Nah, nah, nah, nah, NAH! Valmarg :P...... into the USA....and there I rest my case - and go to sleep, perchance to dream....

...it's been a bloody hard 2-3 days....

zzzzzzzzzz (or zed-zed-zed....)

 ;D Lishka x
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: valmarg on June 30, 2008, 20:46:59
Nah, nah, nah, nah, NAH! Valmarg :P...... into the USA....and there I rest my case - and go to sleep, perchance to dream....
 ;D Lishka x
Just so long as you don't shuffle off your mortal coil A_M ;D ;D

valmarg
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Hyacinth on June 30, 2008, 20:56:09
The good and the bad about dying....

The good is that you get to get a lie-in in the mornings?

The bad is that you're SO bloody stiff...(mind you, some of the men here might think this a bonus?)

 ;D ;D ;D

Hey, before I shuffle off to bed.....in't this a FAB thread? Thanks Ol :-*....it's great to talk with frens, like, with no-one scoring points off each other 8) or getting huffy...or any of that.... 8)
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Suzanne on June 30, 2008, 20:57:04
I have just read though this thread. A few points;

If we are banning words from the UK can we include "mazing", as in amazing but for some reason we seem to have mislaid the a.

Also the phrase "Oh My God, innit", I am not at all sure where this originated from, but suspect AliG and his massif.

Recover the h for with - even Leona Lewis sang "for the very first time wit you.  Even with my broad East Midlands accent I can retain the h on the end of words, its only the beginning where I lose them, although I have noted that they pop up unexpectedly now and again.

Also can anyone enlighten me on whether vehicle has a an almost silent "hi" as the spoken by the english, or whether it's vehicle as the participants on Judge Judy would have it?

Suzanne  :)
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on June 30, 2008, 21:29:18
I like innit. Very popular with the Asian community, where it's not English being spoken incorrectly, but a completely new word. I had two girl students working for me who were ( family were) from Pakistan, and one of them was talking to the other about taking a boy home to meet her parents. The idea of this was so terrifying to both of them that they virtually had a fit of hysterics. They ended up holding on to each other, and all they could say was innit..innit...innit. Very sweet and funny (once i'd decided that neither of them was going to die)
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on June 30, 2008, 21:31:23
or is it were going to die
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Suzanne on June 30, 2008, 21:33:25
Rt, that will keep me awake all night, was or were?
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: GrannieAnnie on June 30, 2008, 22:47:21
Point is........the 'Z' was an import....(ie taken INTO the US by Settlers?).......which we're now casting aside, as without value per se and an inconvenience on a modern keyboard.........?...... ;) ;D

(It isn't any fun when all of you pop off to bed so early. Rahhly!)

Without a Z how on earth will you spell gizzard? With two Sses? It won't sound nearly as quaint.
And wouldn't that sound like you are saying "Kiss hard?"

Which brings up another thing that I find too weird.  This business of spelling various letters of the alphabet.
Not only zed but also Es for S, en for N etc. Why would one have to create a whole word when a single letter would suffice?
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: valmarg on June 30, 2008, 23:41:12
THE ABC

T'was midnight in the schoolroom
And every desk was shut
When suddenly from the alphabet
Was heard a loud "Tut-tut!"

Said A to B "I don't like C;
His manners are a lack.
For all I ever see of C
is a semicircular back!"

I disagree said D to B
I've never found C so
From where I stand he seems to be
An uncompleted O.

C was vexed, "I'm much perplexed,
You criticise my shape,
I'm made like that, to help spell Cat
And Cow and Cool and Cape.

"He's right" said E; said F "Whoopee!"
Said G "Ip ip,  'ooray!"
You're dropping me roared H to G
Don't do it please I pray.

Out of my way LL said to K
I'll make poor I look ILL
To stop this stunt J stood in front
And presto ILL was JILL

U know said V that W
Is twice the age of me
For as a Roman V is five
I'm half as young as he

X and Y yawned sleepily
Look at the time! they said
Let's all get off to beddy byes
They did, then Z-z-z-z-z

Don't know why I'm posting this, something to do with Z. ;D ;D

Anyway, I love it, Spike Milligan at his best.

valmarg
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Baaaaaaaa on July 01, 2008, 00:35:07
Rt, that will keep me awake all night, was or were?

Its the thought of two student girls working on me, that will keep me awake all night  !
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on July 01, 2008, 08:16:50
Rt, that will keep me awake all night, was or were?

that's the problem with this thread - I'm not clever enough to know what's right
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: OllieC on July 01, 2008, 08:40:18
I don't think cleverness has to be a prerequisite to pedantry. I argue whenever possible, and am pretty thick.
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on July 01, 2008, 09:25:47
i suppose a pedant is someone who learns the rules and sticks to them. It takes a bit of confidence to know when it's OK to break them for effect.
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: antipodes on July 01, 2008, 09:48:47
With the Internet I feel like our English has gone down the toilet! People write then don't re-read themselves! and they write rubbish as a result!
My pet hates are:
"loose" when they mean "lose"
"He must of done it" instead of "must have" (idem "would of")
its/it's confusion (come on! just get it right!)
their/there/they're confusion (ggrrrrrr)

I think that most of the time it's just laziness, people don't want to think about learning rules anymore.
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on July 01, 2008, 10:17:32
the truth may be that with computers and email we're all writing a lot more, and what sounds OK in speech doesn't look right written down. On the other hand, here's something that will make your blood boil
http://www.birminghampost.net/news/west-midlands-education-news/2008/07/01/student-picks-up-marks-for-swearing-on-exam-paper-65233-21207054/ (http://www.birminghampost.net/news/west-midlands-education-news/2008/07/01/student-picks-up-marks-for-swearing-on-exam-paper-65233-21207054/)
-he'd have got more marks if he'd put an exclamation mark at the end! Priceless
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: GrannieAnnie on July 01, 2008, 10:51:30
With the Internet I feel like our English has gone down the toilet! People write then don't re-read themselves! and they write rubbish as a result!
My pet hates are:
"loose" when they mean "lose"
"He must of done it" instead of "must have" (idem "would of")
its/it's confusion (come on! just get it right!)
their/there/they're confusion (ggrrrrrr)

I think that most of the time it's just laziness, people don't want to think about learning rules anymore.
Part of me agrees that there is writing laziness out there. But the larger part of me would rather read people's comments written conversationally (as in "off the top of their heads") and freshly uninhibited.

Many folks have been discouraged from writing for fear they'll make mistakes. What a pity that is! They have as many creative ideas to share as those with a spelling talent, and often have a flare for quick humor without which the internet would be a dessert, or is it desert?
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Hyacinth on July 01, 2008, 15:03:46
I can't, atm, access the links that have been put up...something for tonight (or tonite?) when I've more time, but.......

Word of Mouth...

fed up that the letter 'H', pronounced "aitch" is sometimes referred to as haitch.

So there! >:(

 ;D
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: OllieC on July 01, 2008, 15:10:29
They called it haitch where I grew up in the North of Scotland... where they still stare at fires and don't trust wheels.
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: GrannieAnnie on July 01, 2008, 15:52:22
They called it haitch where I grew up in the North of Scotland... where they still stare at fires and don't trust wheels.
:D LOL, Ollie!  Wait til I tell my husband that- his grandfather was from there. Can't wait! teehee!

The street language here is horrendous with obscenities. Aside from that, one hears, "I axed her, "Whatsa matter," instead of "I asked her, "What's the matter?"  Why can't people get the sk correct when they had no problem with it years ago?
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Grandma on July 01, 2008, 15:56:46
O! Don't start me on aitch! Even reporters on the BBC - (who should know better - having a pronunciation unit at their disposal) - are saying 'haitch'! Do they think it sounds 'posh' to put an aitch in front of every vowel?

'Ate it with a passion.
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: hopalong on July 01, 2008, 16:01:31
I don't think cleverness has to be a prerequisite to pedantry. I argue whenever possible, and am pretty thick.

I would like to point out that the correct usage is "prerequisite of" or "prerequisite for", not "prerequisite to".
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on July 01, 2008, 16:22:49
ha go and stand in the corner of the Pedant's Corner ollieC. Or Pedants Corner as the are a lot of us. God! is a lot uf us. My head hurts now.

What's a Gentleman's Prerequisite btw? I've often wondered, and have I got one? Or am I not a Gentleman?
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: GrannieAnnie on July 01, 2008, 16:26:02
I don't think cleverness has to be a prerequisite to pedantry. I argue whenever possible, and am pretty thick.

I would like to point out that the correct usage is "prerequisite of" or "prerequisite for", not "prerequisite to".
Ollie should get 90 points minimum for spelling prerequisite correctly and another 10 for expressing his viewpoint with humility, a rarity on forums.
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: OllieC on July 01, 2008, 16:50:30
Awww, thanks Grannie!

I would like to point out that if you google "prerequisite to pedantry" this discusion pops up now. That was deliberate.

Also, why on earth can't you have a prerequisite to something?
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on July 01, 2008, 17:05:58
i don't understand this word prerequisite.

A requisite is a thing you need to have, and a prerequistite is a thing you need to have before you can have the thing you need to have

doesn't that make a prerequisite another requisite?
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: markfield rover on July 01, 2008, 17:43:15
Prerequisites, a well used  or used well word in a Python's sketch.
The clever get it wrong too , near miss and wait for it .......... I myself, both of which appear on Newsnight too often.
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Hyacinth on July 01, 2008, 18:08:31
h

What's a Gentleman's Prerequisite btw? I've often wondered, and have I got one? Or am I not a Gentleman?

Huh! I'm just in from a hard slog.....many hours under a pitiless sun which has baked my clay soil to bricks......and yay! we're talking about my Passion....FOOD! 8)......but we weren't :'( Not Gentleman's Relish (Patum Peperium) atorl......but I still maintain it's a prerequisite to civiliz ed living...
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Melbourne12 on July 01, 2008, 18:54:26
the truth may be that with computers and email we're all writing a lot more, and what sounds OK in speech doesn't look right written down. On the other hand, here's something that will make your blood boil
 ............ (http://............)
-he'd have got more marks if he'd put an exclamation mark at the end! Priceless

I'd seen that story on the BBC website, but they didn't quote the question ...

The expletive was reportedly given in answer to the question: “Describe the room you’re sitting in,” part of a 2006 GCSE exam. But the student missed out on marks because the phrase was not punctuated. Mr Buckroyd said: “If it had got an exclamation mark it could have got a little bit more.”

I wondered what had prompted the student to write such a thing.  Perhaps he was sitting in a large hall, and was struggling to say, "It's a big f@ck-off room, innit?"

Poor lamb.  He'd probably never had to write anything with an instrument smaller than an aerosol can, and was having problems with his motor control.  So he just extracted the key words.
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on July 01, 2008, 19:19:46
the examiner said - it's better that he wrote something than write nothing - no it ******** isn't  ??? Are we showing our age in assuming it wasn't a girl, as only men swear? (That's why we have menswear departments  :D)

still don't know what a Gentleman's Prerequisite is. Is it a euphemism for something, and why isn't there a nice way of saying euphemism?
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: hopalong on July 01, 2008, 21:09:07
I don't think cleverness has to be a prerequisite to pedantry. I argue whenever possible, and am pretty thick.

I would like to point out that the correct usage is "prerequisite of" or "prerequisite for", not "prerequisite to".
Ollie should get 90 points minimum for spelling prerequisite correctly and another 10 for expressing his viewpoint with humility, a rarity on forums.
I agree. I was just trying to enter into the pedantic spirit.
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: OllieC on July 01, 2008, 21:45:31
You mean you wanted the spirit of pedantry to enter you?

I'm off to Belfast for a week now so sadly must let you all continue with this merry jape on your owns. Hope to see plenty of nit picking (picking knits?) upon my return...

Ollie
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Melbourne12 on July 01, 2008, 23:53:19
Apropos of not very much, I was once delighted to be referred to as a pedanticist.  ;D
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: star on July 02, 2008, 01:20:10
i don't understand this word prerequisite.

A requisite is a thing you need to have, and a prerequistite is a thing you need to have before you can have the thing you need to have

doesn't that make a prerequisite another requisite?

ROFL...........i CAN'T STOP LAUGHING, THANKS RT
[/size][/b]
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Melbourne12 on July 03, 2008, 08:03:40
I'm afraid that as I travelled into the City this morning, I picked up a copy of the Metro.  But my morning was cheered up by a wonderful letter from a reader.

Apparently someone had complained that he wasn't able to understand a motorway sign that read "Discontinuous Hard Shoulder".  This prompted much tut-tutting from the more highly educated Metro readers, including this gem:

I accept the phrase is not common usage but simple dissemination of it should have solved the mystery. By the way, dissemination means "to break into component elements".
Derek Colley, Greater Manchester.


 ;D ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Barnowl on July 03, 2008, 11:22:40
I can't find an online dictionary that gives dissemination that meaning - was it tongue in cheek? Perhaps he meant deconstruction?
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on July 03, 2008, 11:36:43
Mr Pedant from the Metro has made a right idiot of himself there! Dissemination means having a vasectomy, as any fule kno
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Barnowl on July 03, 2008, 12:04:50
Dissemination means having a vasectomy, as any fule kno

That's what I thought. Thank heavens for a classical education.
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on July 03, 2008, 12:16:11
you know what they say - an Education is what you have left when you've forgotten all you've learnt
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: derekcolley on July 03, 2008, 18:43:23
Melbourne12, I'm afraid to say that I am Mr. Pedant who extemporated on Mr Mellor's inability to define a 'discontinous hard shoulder' (in Metro on Weds) ... I stumbled across your post while searching to see if my views had been printed.

The full text was 'With regard to Andy Mellor's comments about his failure to understand the meaning of 'discontinuous hard shoulder' (Metro Weds), I would have thought it was quite a simple concept to grasp.  Discontinuous is a synonym for intermittent, and is opposite to continuous, i.e. the driver can expect a hard shoulder that is available 'on and off' that stretch of road.  Had Mr. Mellor reached for a thesaurus he would have discovered this.  I accept the word is not in common use but simple dissemination of it should have solved the mystery.  Dissemination means 'to break into component elements', by the way.
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on July 03, 2008, 19:19:13
no, still don't see that as a meaning. Breaking something up into small parts is not dissemination. The important part of the meaning is to spread it around after. Dispersion or diffusion

Blimey Melbourne12, talk about the Surveillance Society!
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: calendula on July 03, 2008, 19:42:32

still don't know what a Gentleman's Prerequisite is. Is it a euphemism for something, and why isn't there a nice way of saying euphemism?

The Modern Gentleman A Guide to Essential Manners, Savvy & Vice by Phineas Mollod and Jason Tesauro "A man may possess expensive duds, slick wheels, and a tongue to match, but these are not the prerequisites of a gentleman. A gentleman is defined by how he carries himself in fairways and stormy climes. A student of the classics and a pilot of the new, he recommends sizzling reads, pays his gambling debts, mans the grill, and curbs his dog. Reserved, flamboyant, or likely somewhere in between, a gentleman's charisma is cultivated, not canned. He fosters an infectious comfort in others as they quietly marvel at his manner and his hats, from the erudite bowler to the plucky fedora. Little charms performed thoughtfully ensure that inevitable faux pas are measured against a graceful reputation. He can be trusted with his word and your wife."

OK so who's up for a woman's pre-requisites with or without pedantry  ;D
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: GrannieAnnie on July 03, 2008, 20:51:14
From Wikipedia:  "Pedantry can also be an indication of certain developmental disorders. In particular those with high-functioning autism, often have behavior characterized by pedantic speech.[2] Those with Asperger's tend to obsess over the minutiae of subjects and are prone to giving long detailed expositions, and the related corrections, and may gravitate to careers in academia or science where such obsessive attention to detail is often functional and rewarded.

[edit] Obsessive-compulsive personality disorder is also in part characterized by a form of pedantry that is overly concerned with the correct following of rules, procedures and practices.[3] Sometimes the rules that OCPD sufferers obsessively follow are of their own devising, or are corruptions or re-interpretations of the letter of actual rules."

[edit] I'm not sure I wish to be a pedantess anymore. ;D
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: betula on July 03, 2008, 20:54:52
Knew it weren't good for ya ;D
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on July 03, 2008, 21:03:45

still don't know what a Gentleman's Prerequisite is. Is it a euphemism for something, and why isn't there a nice way of saying euphemism?

The Modern Gentleman A Guide to Essential Manners, Savvy & Vice by Phineas Mollod and Jason Tesauro "A man may possess expensive duds, slick wheels, and a tongue to match, but these are not the prerequisites of a gentleman. A gentleman is defined by how he carries himself in fairways and stormy climes. A student of the classics and a pilot of the new, he recommends sizzling reads, pays his gambling debts, mans the grill, and curbs his dog. Reserved, flamboyant, or likely somewhere in between, a gentleman's charisma is cultivated, not canned. He fosters an infectious comfort in others as they quietly marvel at his manner and his hats, from the erudite bowler to the plucky fedora. Little charms performed thoughtfully ensure that inevitable faux pas are measured against a graceful reputation. He can be trusted with his word and your wife."

OK so who's up for a woman's pre-requisites with or without pedantry  ;D

that's ME! apart from the Marvelous Hats (they make my ears look a bit funny)
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Hyacinth on July 03, 2008, 21:09:44


 I'm not sure I wish to be a pedantess anymore. ;D

"pedantrix", shoorly?

 ;) ;D
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Suzanne on July 03, 2008, 23:29:39
Discontinuous is a synonym for intermittent, and is opposite to continuous, i.e. the driver can expect a hard shoulder that is available 'on and off' that stretch of road.  Had Mr. Mellor reached for a thesaurus he would have discovered this. 

Where do you get thesaurus whilst driving along the motorway  ??? And if you do keep one in the glove compartment how on earth do you flip to the right page and keep your eyes on the road.  ;D
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: djbrenton on July 03, 2008, 23:32:15
By paying discontinuous attention to the road, obviously.
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Suzanne on July 03, 2008, 23:37:28
 8)
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: tonybloke on July 03, 2008, 23:37:54
By paying discontinuous attention to the road, obviously.
or by discontinuously paying attention to the road, and intermittently paying attention to their blackberry? ;)
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: djbrenton on July 04, 2008, 00:00:53
If you're going to start a sentence with 'or', I really think you should follow it with a comma and ,perhaps, capitalize.  8)
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on July 04, 2008, 08:14:08
if they'd used the word "discontiguous" instead of "discontinuous" then we'd all have known what was going on from the start
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: GrannieAnnie on July 04, 2008, 08:27:57
Perhaps they should use a sign with a diagram instead of English?
There are times a picture is worth a thousand incomprehensible words.
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: hopalong on July 04, 2008, 08:40:05
If you're going to start a sentence with 'or', I really think you should follow it with a comma and ,perhaps, capitalize.  8)

Is it ever acceptable to begin a sentence with the word "Or"? Surely this does not qualify as a sentence?
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: GrannieAnnie on July 04, 2008, 08:46:46
If you're going to start a sentence with 'or', I really think you should follow it with a comma and ,perhaps, capitalize.  8)

Is it ever acceptable to begin a sentence with the word "Or"? Surely this does not qualify as a sentence?
The next time you read a novel notice that books these days are  often not written in complete sentences which is considered fine because people don't talk in complete sentences, and it helps the story flow more naturally.
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: hopalong on July 04, 2008, 10:26:23
If you're going to start a sentence with 'or', I really think you should follow it with a comma and ,perhaps, capitalize.  8)

Is it ever acceptable to begin a sentence with the word "Or"? Surely this does not qualify as a sentence?
The next time you read a novel notice that books these days are  often not written in complete sentences which is considered fine because people don't talk in complete sentences, and it helps the story flow more naturally.

And lots of very good novels are not written like that.  Or perhaps they are.
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on July 04, 2008, 10:47:49
thinking about it as an OCD pedant, there's a real problem with this hard shoulder - since it is made up of sections, it isn't continous, hence can't be discontinuous. Also since these sections aren't touching it isn't contiguous, hence can't be discontiguous. It also isn't disconcatenated, partly because it isn't linked together, and partly because I just made the word up.
So as far as I can think, there is no word that describes the motorway hard shoulder, with or without bits missing

discofever is something else entirely
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Melbourne12 on July 04, 2008, 12:24:14
thinking about it as an OCD pedant, there's a real problem with this hard shoulder - since it is made up of sections, it isn't continous, hence can't be discontinuous. Also since these sections aren't touching it isn't contiguous, hence can't be discontiguous. It also isn't disconcatenated, partly because it isn't linked together, and partly because I just made the word up.
So as far as I can think, there is no word that describes the motorway hard shoulder, with or without bits missing

discofever is something else entirely

I'm not sure whether this helps or not, but in the jargon of geographic information systems, a motorway hard shoulder would be referred to as a "linear" asset.

If you accept that, then I suppose that continuous and discontinuous would be the best choice to describe something linear.
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on July 04, 2008, 12:51:06
if the hard shoulder was made out of a single strip of metal, say 100 miles long, then that would be a remarkable thing and would need a word to describe it, and that word would be continuous (or ******* crazy). As the hard shoulder is actually made up of little bits, on the one hand it is not remarkable, and on the other hand it is a different thing, so it needs a different word. None of those words would do. I won't write them as typing "uou" is upsetting. We need a word for something big that's made up of small things that actually aren't touching each other
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: froglets on July 04, 2008, 13:31:05
conglomeration?
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: GrannieAnnie on July 04, 2008, 13:47:30
Don't people THINK a shoulder will be continuous and therefor "discontinuous" would be understandable?
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: froglets on July 04, 2008, 15:36:01
Why do we call it a shoulder?  Do we have motorway arms, or clavicles, or breastbones?

Froglets - about to drive to the top end of the M6 avoiding all body related parts!
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: manicscousers on July 04, 2008, 18:21:09
dived or dove ?
as in to one side
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: valmarg on July 04, 2008, 19:18:36
Manics, a while ago I read the Melvyn Bragg book 'The Adventure that is English (a biography of a language).

In it was a fantastic poem on the vagaries of the English language.  Offhand the only one I can remember is: the plural of mouse is mice, so why isn't the plural of house hice?

Thoroughly enjoyed the book.

valmarg
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on July 04, 2008, 20:02:37
Is it true that there isn't an English word for the Back of the Knee? back of the head is occiput, but what about the knee  :D

There should be a word for that involuntary twitch your writing arm gives when you're doung Sudoku and you think you've got a number and then immediately realise you're wrong
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: valmarg on July 04, 2008, 21:17:14
There should be a word for that involuntary twitch your writing arm gives when you's it true that there isn't an English word for the Back of the Knee? back of the hre doung Sudoku and you think you've got a number and then immediately realise you're wrong
[/uote]
A word for an involuntary twitch - hows about tic?

valmarg
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on July 04, 2008, 21:24:19
I was thinking of Sudok-Oh-Bugger
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: valmarg on July 04, 2008, 21:52:39
And to go off at a complete pedantic tangent, how about, when you pay for something that is £x.99p, and the shop assistant says, 'and there's one pence change'.

NO!!  Pence is the plural of penny, so there is no such coin as the one pence piece.  It is a penny, ie and a penny change.

valmarg
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on July 05, 2008, 07:06:08
since everything costs £x.99, we should solve the problem by having a 99p coin  ???
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: GrannieAnnie on July 05, 2008, 10:42:06
And to go off at a complete pedantic tangent, how about, when you pay for something that is £x.99p, and the shop assistant says, 'and there's one pence change'.

NO!!  Pence is the plural of penny, so there is no such coin as the one pence piece.  It is a penny, ie and a penny change.

valmarg

  I know the English English is supposed to be more accurate but in this case I believe American English corrected the problem. The plural of penny is pennies, just as the plural of money is monies.
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: valmarg on July 05, 2008, 14:59:55
Sorry GrannieAnnie, the plural of money is moneys.  The 'change the y into i and add es' rule has wrongly been used.  The result would be moneies. ;D

Another word ending in ey is trolley, the plural of which is trolleys.  I you use trollies, I think that's something up North they wear under their kecks. ;D

valmarg
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on July 05, 2008, 15:15:04
the pence thing came about because of decimalisation, when coins stopped having special names. 50 pence, 10 pence, why not 1 pence?

Surely monies is OK? Moneys may be right too, but I'd never say it, I mean write it.
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: valmarg on July 05, 2008, 15:23:13
the pence thing came about because of decimalisation, when coins stopped having special names. 50 pence, 10 pence, why not 1 pence?

Surely monies is OK? Moneys may be right too, but I'd never say it, I mean write it.

If you look on the coin it says 'one penny'.

Monies is accepted these days, but grammatically it is wrong.

Anyway, this is 'Pedant's Corner'.  Are you saying I can't be a pedant. ???

valmarg
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: asbean on July 05, 2008, 15:30:43
"money" is an uncountable or non count noun. Like wine, rice information etc.   It becomes countable if you define it differently - coins, notes, glasses, bottles, grains, pieces etc.  There are circumstances with a lot of uncountable nouns where they can become countable (monies sometimes), hair (waiter, there's a hair in my soup).
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on July 05, 2008, 16:08:22

If you look on the coin it says 'one penny'.


as i don't get out of bed for less than 30K, all this talk about pennies is lost on me  ;D (I wish btw)
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: grawrc on July 05, 2008, 18:35:44
The plural of "money" is either "moneys" or "monies"; the plural of "trolley", which can also be spelt "trolly", can be either "trolleys" or "trollies". All these variants are acceptable.
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on July 05, 2008, 18:44:44
The word i don't like is "flammable". What was wrong with inflammable? Just because some people burnt themselves to death because they didn't know that "in-" doesn't always mean "not". Let them all fry!!
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: tonybloke on July 05, 2008, 19:18:39
and why does phonetic start with a P??
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: valmarg on July 05, 2008, 19:36:05
The plural of "money" is either "moneys" or "monies"; the plural of "trolley", which can also be spelt "trolly", can be either "trolleys" or "trollies". All these variants are acceptable.

I agree about money, but I understand that trolleys and trollies have completely different meanings.

Trolleys are what you push round a supermarket.  Trollies are knickers, as in 'she'll drop her trollies for anybody'. ;D ;D ;D

valmarg
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on July 05, 2008, 19:48:12
and why is abbreviation such a long word?
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: betula on July 05, 2008, 19:58:50
The plural of "money" is either "moneys" or "monies"; the plural of "trolley", which can also be spelt "trolly", can be either "trolleys" or "trollies". All these variants are acceptable.

I agree about money, but I understand that trolleys and trollies have completely different meanings.

Trolleys are what you push round a supermarket.  Trollies are knickers, as in 'she'll drop her trollies for anybody'. ;D ;D ;D

valmarg


Never heard that one before,is this another Saturday night posting ;D
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: grawrc on July 05, 2008, 22:20:20
The plural of "money" is either "moneys" or "monies"; the plural of "trolley", which can also be spelt "trolly", can be either "trolleys" or "trollies". All these variants are acceptable.

I agree about money, but I understand that trolleys and trollies have completely different meanings.

Trolleys are what you push round a supermarket.  Trollies are knickers, as in 'she'll drop her trollies for anybody'. ;D ;D ;D

valmarg

Ah the Oxford English dictionary will be wrong then! :o :o

Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: valmarg on July 05, 2008, 23:01:17
We've only got the 2004 version of the Concise OED, and 'trollies' is not in, but I think it is more a Lancashire dialect word.

valmarg
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: asbean on July 05, 2008, 23:04:30
I've never dropped my trollies - my knickers, perhaps, in my dim and distant past, but never trollies  :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: tonybloke on July 05, 2008, 23:28:10
I think 'trollies' is a railway term, meaning a part of the under-carriage?
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: saddad on July 05, 2008, 23:38:16
I prefer Trolly Dollies myself...  ::)
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: saddad on July 05, 2008, 23:39:39
Are non-count nouns like collective nouns? Or is that a Marxist/Leninist term for totally confused?  :o
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: valmarg on July 05, 2008, 23:55:44
In my case most definitely.  But also not 'absolutely'. ;D ;D

valmarg
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: GrannieAnnie on July 06, 2008, 03:08:59
Sorry GrannieAnnie, the plural of money is moneys.  The 'change the y into i and add es' rule has wrongly been used.  The result would be moneies. ;D

Another word ending in ey is trolley, the plural of which is trolleys.  I you use trollies, I think that's something up North they wear under their kecks. ;D

valmarg

According to Miriam-Webster both spellings are correct "inflected Form(s):
    plural moneys or mon·ies "    I guess if it is good enough for them it is good enough for me.
Title: Re: Pedant's Corner
Post by: Rhubarb Thrasher on July 06, 2008, 07:31:21
the only time i've heard trollies used was by Mike Harding
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal