Picture posting is enabled for all :)
They are all shouting about peoples rights and DNA should not be kept if you have not been found guilty of a crime. What about the rights of the people who are going to have a crime done to them because the perpetrator can easily hide away.Sexual crimes, these are mostly against women and children and can be solved very quickly if the police can access DNA records. Also these types of attacks will decrease drastically if there was a data base of everyone. If you have nothing to hide you have nothing to worry about. I know this sounds very big brother, but I cannot see any sense in the civil rights people shouting no.
I don't see how a national DNA database is anything but a good thing. It's a bugger if you're a criminal, obviously, but if you've got nothing to hide you've got nothing to fear.
Quote from: Unwashed on November 11, 2009, 21:18:15I don't see how a national DNA database is anything but a good thing. It's a bugger if you're a criminal, obviously, but if you've got nothing to hide you've got nothing to fear.???? Erm, planting evidence at a scene, mixing up evidence, losing evidence, I would fear all of that but I have nothing to hide!
It frightens me witless..... :-X
Ten myths about Britain's National DNA Database.http://reclaimyourdna.org/further-information/ten-myths-about-the-national-dna-database/
A good use, and a good result... we aren't against using DNA evidence, we just doubt the value of retaining "innocent" people's....