Picture posting is enabled for all :)
Animadvertistine, ubicumque stes, fumum recta in faciem ferri?  ..Jim
.. It is viewed by organic certifying bodies over here to be so detrimental to sustainable production, which is now the goal of certified organic protocols, that is a prohibited, as opposed to approved or restricted, practice. No-dig/no-till methods actually encourage leaching of nutrients and subsequent ground water contamination in all but semi-arid or desert climates.....Presently no-till is widely used throughout the "bread-basket", the great plains, of the U.S.....
Well in the next few weeks i shall be taking some practical action on this front by getting my school growing club under way. I shall fill you in on whether this produces environmentally aware good citizens or I-hate-gardening cynics.Session 1 is going to be devoted to sawing up planks and making raised bed frames, and sending some seeds and compost home..... session 2 is open to suggestions..... come on guys stop theorising and help me out here. What next.....
The immediately obvious difference between no-till and no-dig is that no-till uses large quantities of chemicals, no-dig doesn't. There may be other differences, I'm not sure. Anyone know more, or have any references I could chase up?
Very interesting info John. Maybe the no-till methods cause problems because of monoculture and the large bare areas (no hedges or permanent plants) involved too?
No-till here is not used widely commercially, more often lighter cultivation is used, and they involve crop rotation.
...... Do you know where is it used in the U.K.?