|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unwashed
Hectare
    
View Gallery

Vexatious, moi?

|
 |
« Reply #17 on: July 20, 2010, 19:45:16 » |
|
There is nothing in the allotments legislation that bans the use of hoses.
S.76 Water Industry Act 1991 (as ammended by S.36 Flood and Water Management Act 2010) makes a long list of things that can be banned in a hosepipe ban, but whether or not water an allotment with a hose is banned depends entirely on exactly what the water undertaking actually banned.
That said, what I think we're talking about here is whether watering with a hose from a standpipe can be banned by the landlord. Clearly some allotment sites make such a ban, but the question is whether the ban is enforceable.
On a site let under the Allotments Acts all rules are made under the Power created by S.28 Small Holdings and Allotments Act 1908 so you can't just make any rule. Rules can define the conditions under which [allotments] are to be cultivated. I guess that probably includes how you water.
A Rule banning hosepipes might possibly fall foul of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. Landlords can't impose any old condition on their tenants. Group 18(h), Unreasonable ancillary obligations and restrictions of the OFT guidance says There is a clear risk of unfairness where terms put consumers at risk of incurring contractual penalties that are more severe than is necessary to protect the real interest of the supplier. My guess would be that the landlord does have a legitimate concern that hosepipes will be left on so I think a Rule only allowing butts to be filled isn't unreasonable, though I'd suggest a total ban on hosepipes goes beyound protecting the landlord's legitimate interest.
Remember though that a ban on hoses can't be introduced without notice. If the tenancy agreements says the landlord can add any old arbitrary rule then that is certainly unenforceable because of UTCCR, so the landlord has to give notice to end the tenancy and offer a new agreement at the termination, and on Allotment Acts sites that's going to be the tenancy aniversary after September 2011, and otherwise on the tenancy aniversary after the contractual notice, or 6 months by default.
Personally I think we make too many Rules. I'd be surprised if water was used at more than £1.50/pole on average for a site, and it doesn't seem unreasonable that this cost be recouped in the rent.
|
| |
|
|
Logged
|
An Agreement of the People for a firm and present peace upon grounds of common right
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allotments 4 All
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|